The limited testimony challenged on appeal was not expert opinion and was properly admitted, since it explained why the officers placed defendant and his accomplice under observation in the first place and was probative of the reliability of the officers' observations (see, People v Easton,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.