Although labeled as a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of, inter alia, constitutional violations of defendant's right to a speedy trial, the motion failed to address the constitutional issues and consisted exclusively of defendant's claim that his statutory rights under CPL 30.30 were violated. Having failed to allege, as he does now, that the trial court should have dismissed the indictment based on the factors set forth in People v Taranovich
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ROWE
244 A.D.2d 295 (1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 72
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne Rowe, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 25, 1997
November 25, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
