The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant intentionally participated in the sale. Issues of credibility were properly before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its determination.
Since the undercover officer continued to work undercover, sometimes in the exact area where the defendant was arrested; expected to return to that area within a week or two of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.