OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HINE

No. 97-1153.

80 Ohio St.3d 448 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HINE, A.K.A ROHRER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 31, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Frederick L. Oremus, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Respondent moved to stay disciplinary proceedings in Ohio because she filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States asserting First Amendment rights. However, under Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(3), the only ground for a stay of reciprocal discipline proceeding in Ohio is a showing that the sanction has been stayed in the disciplining state. Not only did respondent fail to present evidence that the disciplinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases