The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's exculpatory theory was presented to and considered by the jury, and we see no reason to disturb its verdict.
Defendant's challenge to the certification of the ballistics report presented to the Grand Jury is, in essence, a challenge to the sufficiency of the Grand Jury evidence and, as such, is not reviewable on appeal (CPL 210.30 [6]). In any event, this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
