CHRISTELLES v. NISSAN MOTOR CORP.


305 N.J. Super. 222 (1997)

CAROL CHRISTELLES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NISSAN MOTOR CORP., U.S.A., RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 7, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Coslit argued the cause for appellant (Fitzsimmons, Ringle & Jacobs, attorneys; Michele Schreier, of counsel and on the brief).

Thomas J. Sateary argued the cause for respondent Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (Cooper, Rose & English, attorneys; Mr. Sateary, on the brief).

Carmen A. Rodriguez, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey, Division of Consumer Affairs (Peter Verniero, Attorney General, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Rodriguez, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, D'ANNUNZIO and COBURN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

The lessee of a Nissan automobile appeals from a final decision of the Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs (Division), rejecting appellant's claim under New Jersey's "Lemon Law" (Act). N.J.S.A. 56:12-29 to -46. We now reverse and remand.

The claimant, Carol Christelles, and her expert witness, Gary Quick, testified in the proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases