Defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence and statements was properly denied. We agree with the hearing court that defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the station. Defendant's current argument that, after initial interrogation, he was unlawfully confined to a holding cell is unpreserved and without merit. In any event, even if we were to find that defendant was unlawfully confined, we would conclude that the physical evidence was not a fruit of such illegality...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
