OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HARDESTY

No. 97-1301.

80 Ohio St.3d 444 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HARDESTY.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 31, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Michael J. Bender, Jr., for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board. Having reviewed the entire record, we find, as did the board, that several of respondent's violations were the result of ready deference to his clients' bidding. Taking the facts most favorable to respondent, Creighton was reluctant to respond to discovery, Hicks refused to provide the information necessary to complete bankruptcy schedules, and Olson both provided opinions from other counsel that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases