STATE v. NANCE


148 N.J. 376 (1997)

689 A.2d 1351

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LYLE NANCE, A/K/A LYLE D. NANCE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 20, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond W. Hoffman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Clifford J. Minor, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Francis J. Hartman argued the cause for respondent (Hartman, Nugent & Zamost, attorneys; Deirdre K. Hartman, on the briefs).

Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Peter G. Verniero, Attorney General, attorney).

David A. Ruhnke argued the cause for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey (Ruhnke & Barrett, attorneys).

Lyle D. Nance submitted a supplemental brief, pro se.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether it was error to admit evidence of defendant's "other crimes, wrongs, or acts" against a third party in a purposeful or knowing murder trial to prove that the homicide was neither accidental nor in self-defense. The Appellate Division in an unpublished opinion concluded that it was reversible error to admit that evidence. We granted the State's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases