LAMMERS v. LAMMERS


235 A.D.2d 286 (1997)

652 N.Y.S.2d 288

William H. Lammers, Respondent, v. Elizabeth F. Lammers, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 21, 1997


Given the numerous frivolous motions defendant has made, it was a proper exercise of discretion for the court to enjoin her from making any further motion in this action without judicial approval (Schwartz v Nordstrom, Inc., 160 A.D.2d 240, 242, appeal dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 845, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 711). We have considered defendant's other points and find them to be without merit (see, CPLR 2214; 22 NYCRR 202...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases