The court properly refused to charge the jury on the defense of agency. There is no reasonable view of the evidence that could support a finding that defendant was acting solely on behalf of the buyer and had no independent desire to promote the drug transaction, where, even under defendant's version of the facts, she supplied drugs, paraphernalia, and a place to regular customers for a set fee, provided recommendations as to what brand or kind of drugs her customers should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
