The offending statements contained in defendants' letter to plaintiff, advising that defendants had been retained to represent plaintiff's former employee, that the employee had possible claims against plaintiff in addition to those she had already brought before the New York City Commission on Human Rights, and describing the allegations behind those claims, are absolutely privileged (see, Caplan v Winslett,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LIEBERMAN v. HOFFMAN
239 A.D.2d 273 (1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 18
Arthur M. Lieberman, Individually and as a Partner on Behalf of Lieberman & Nowak, L. L. P., Appellant, v. Andrew S. Hoffman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 22, 1997
May 22, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
