1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 299 N.J.
  5. 299 N.J. Super. 203 (1997)
 

CAMECO, INC. v. GEDICKE

299 N.J. Super. 203 (1997)

CAMECO, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONALD GEDICKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A NEWTON TRANSPORT SERVICE, NEWTON TRANSPORT SERVICE AND PRISCILLA MUELLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 31, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Donovan argued the cause for appellant (Fox and Fox, attorneys; Mr. Donovan, of counsel and on the brief).

James F. Keegan argued the cause for respondents (Bendit, Weinstock & Sharbaugh, attorneys; Mr. Keegan, of counsel; Mr. Keegan, Sherri Davis Fowler, and Shari T. Competiello on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr. and COBURN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Cameco, Inc. (Cameco) appeals from a judgment of involuntary dismissal of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Donald Gedicke, individually and d/b/a Newton Transport Service (Gedicke), Newton Transport Service (Newton), and Priscilla Mueller (Mueller) at the conclusion of its proofs in this action to recover damages on theories of breach of fiduciary duty and loyalty, conversion, unjust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases