We reject defendant supermarket's contention that there is no evidence from which a jury could infer that it had constructive notice of the dangerous condition that allegedly caused plaintiff's fall, where plaintiff's bill of particulars, deposition testimony and opposing affidavit alleged the "whole" aisle in which she fell was covered with, among other things, wet and dry green liquid and foot marks indicating that the liquid had been "stepped on" (see, Negri...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
