The action was properly dismissed in the absence of any evidence tending to show that the appraiser was aware that the appraisal, which specifically stated that it was to be used for insurance purposes only, was being performed for plaintiff's rather than the seller's benefit, and would be relied upon by plaintiff in deciding whether to purchase the art (see, Credit Alliance Corp. v Andersen & Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
