Since defendant sought no further relief after his lone objection to the People's summation prompted a curative instruction by the court, defendant's current claims are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find that defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the People's summation, which was responsive to defendant's summation (see, People v Salaman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DeJESUS
236 A.D.2d 263 (1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 298
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Orlando DeJesus, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 18, 1997
February 18, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.