VAHILA v. HALL

No. 95-2196.

77 Ohio St.3d 421 (1997)

VAHILA ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HALL ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 12, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McLaughlin, McNally & Carlin, Clair M. Carlin and Thomas M. Vasvari, for appellants.

Ulmer & Berne, P.L.L., Thomas R. Kelly and Jay W. Pearlman, for appellees.

Frank E. Todaro, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.


DOUGLAS, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the trial court and court of appeals properly concluded that appellees were entitled to summary judgment on the claims set forth in appellants' legal malpractice complaint. For the reasons that follow, we find that summary judgment should not have been granted in favor of appellees. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases