PEOPLE v. RUMPH


235 A.D.2d 260 (1997)

653 N.Y.S.2d 103

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norman Rumph, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 14, 1997


While the court's instruction improperly singled out a defense witness as "interested", the error was harmless in light of the permissive nature of the charge, and the marginal value of the witness's testimony (see, People v Hicks, 226 A.D.2d 189, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 966).

Defense counsel's general objection to the officer's testimony that he had chased defendant's car the previous evening was insufficient to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases