236 A.D.2d 254 (1997)

653 N.Y.S.2d 558

RKH Holding Corp., Respondent, v. 207 Second Ave. Realty Corp. et al., Defendants. Janet Chang, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 11, 1997

In denying vacatur for failure to demonstrate a meritorious defense to the foreclosure action, the motion court correctly found that the proposed intervenor had not refuted the mortgagee's assertion that it was not on notice of the shareholder derivative action involving the corporate mortgagor because the lis pendens in that action had been cancelled and did not appear in the title report ordered by the mortgagee. Thus, no duty of inquiry arose with respect to the borrowers' authority to obtain the underlying loans on the corporation's behalf.

Leave to intervene was also properly denied in view of the proposed intervenor's year-long delay in seeking such relief, despite her undisputed knowledge that the foreclosure action had been commenced.

We have considered the proposed intervenor's other arguments and find them to be without merit.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases