1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 296 N.J.
  5. 296 N.J. Super. 187 (1997)
 

CZURA v. SIEGEL

296 N.J. Super. 187 (1997)

GREGORY J. CZURA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CRAIG SIEGEL, JANET SIEGEL AND SHELLEY BALESTRIERI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 8, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rutgers Law School Constitutional Litigation Clinic, and Nashel, Kates, Nussman, Rapone & Ellis, attorneys for appellants (Frank Askin and Michael B. Kates, on the brief).

Respondent Gregory J. Czura, Esq., submitted a pro se brief.

Before Judges BROCHIN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

This defamation action was dismissed with prejudice by an order for summary judgment in defendants' favor that was filed April 27, 1995. By a notice of motion filed December 11, 1995, defendants moved "for an order awarding counsel fees and costs pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, the New Jersey Frivolous Claims Act." After oral argument of the motion, the motion judge stated:

It is clear to this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases