SCHWARTZ v. TAB OPERATING CO., INC.


239 A.D.2d 244 (1997)

657 N.Y.S.2d 412

Rachel Schwartz, Respondent, v. Tab Operating Co., Inc., et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 15, 1997


The trial court's ruling not to preclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert for noncompliance with CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i) was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Lesser v Lacher, 203 A.D.2d 181), where such testimony was limited to what was contained in the expert's records that defendants could have obtained well before trial, having been furnished with authorizations therefor. Thus, defendants could have been surprised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases