GUPTA v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 96-2437.

79 Ohio St.3d 397 (1997)

GUPTA ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Forrester & Kovanda and Ralph D. Kovanda, for appellants.


Per Curiam.

The only argument which appellants raise in this appeal is that the BTA erred in giving no consideration to the four failed purchase offers. We disagree.

Gupta testified to four offers received during a period from August 1994 to July 1996. Counsel for the BOR objected to the introduction of the offers on the basis that the offers were too distant from the tax lien date and were not relevant because they were not actual sales. The attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases