The trial court properly denied defendant's request for an agency charge, because there was no reasonable view of the evidence supporting the theory that defendant acted solely for the buyer. Defendant initiated the transaction, led the undercover officer to the codefendant, communicated to the codefendant the undercover's proposed purchase, took the money from the officer in exchange for the drugs, and transferred it to the codefendant (see, People v Alston
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BRIMBERRY
237 A.D.2d 229 (1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 27
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Desiree Brimberry, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 27, 1997
March 27, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
