The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Factual issues concerning the identification testimony and forensic evidence were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its verdict (see, People v Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. We have considered defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
