1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 300 N.J.
  5. 300 N.J. Super. 158 (1997)
 

BUCK v. MacDONALD

300 N.J. Super. 158 (1997)

CARL V. BUCK, II, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES A. MacDONALD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laura C. Tharney argued the cause for appellant (Heine Associates, P.A., attorneys; Ms. Tharney, of counsel, and on the letter-brief).

Philip J. Espinosa argued the cause for respondent (Pennington & Thompson, P.C., attorneys; Robert D. Thompson and Mr. Espinosa, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, BAIME and PAUL G. LEVY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from the September 15, 1996 order of the Law Division granting defendant's motion for summary judgment based on the determination that plaintiff's action is barred by the entire controversy doctrine. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was also denied.

The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiff's indemnification claim is barred by the entire controversy doctrine in light of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases