The motion court properly concluded that plaintiff, which had no contractual relationship with Seckler Associates and which has not brought any causes of action against that entity, should not be compelled to further respond to the interrogatory in question. As the court noted, Seckler may wish to seek disclosure from its general contractor, which initiated the second third...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
