Defendant's claim that the People failed to establish that reasonable suspicion existed to support his initial detention on the ground that the prosecution failed to elicit the content of the radio descriptions overheard by a witness, which according to the witness matched the appearance of the perpetrators, is unpreserved for appellate review since defendant never raised this specific argument before the suppression court (see, People v Vasquez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SANTANA
235 A.D.2d 220 (1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 505
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Santana, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 9, 1997
January 9, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
