That the arbitrators did not explain their calculation of the Statute of Limitations, or why plaintiff's claims lack merit, does not mean that the award was not final and definite within the meaning of CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) or imperfect in a matter of form within the meaning of CPLR 7511 (c) (3). The award was properly confirmed because it determined the controversy submitted and does not create a new controversy (see, Matter of Meisels v Uhr,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PURPURA v. BEAR STEARNS COS. INC.
238 A.D.2d 216 (1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 253
Nicholas Purpura, Appellant, v. Bear Stearns Companies Inc. et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 17, 1997
April 17, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
