The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Discrepancies in the identification testimony presented factual questions for the jury, and we see no reason to disturb its determinations (People v Jenkins,
Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. None of the procedures was "so unnecessarily...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.