Per Curiam.
By order of this Court, dated December 2, 1996, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4 (l) (1) (ii) and (iii), upon a finding that he is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest based on his substantial admissions under oath that he committed acts of professional misconduct including, inter alia, conversion and commingling of escrow funds, and other
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.