1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 205 B.R.
  5. 205 B.R. 238 (1997)
 

IN RE KIM

BAP No. CC-96-1017-MeRuV, Bankruptcy No. LA95-26561-SB.

205 B.R. 238 (1997)

In re Peter KIM and Esther Kim, Debtors. ARDMOR VENDING CO. dba Great Northern, Ardmor Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Appellants, v. Peter and Esther KIM, Appellees.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 5, 1996.

Decided January 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myles M. Mattenson, Los Angeles, CA, for Ardmor Vending Co.

A. Edward Briseno, Law Offices of David B. Bloom, Los Angeles, CA, for Peter & Esther Kim.

Before: MEYERS, RUSSELL and VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judges.

OPINION

MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:

I

The debtors filed a Chapter 13 plan proposing to treat one creditor as only partially secured and another as wholly unsecured. The creditors objected to the plan contending that the debtors had undervalued the collateral securing their claims. The debtors responded by filing objections to the creditors' claims. The bankruptcy court sustained the claims objections and confirmed the plan.

We AFFIRM.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases