The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues relating to the reliability of the identification testimony of the observing officer were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings.
The court properly excluded the testimony of a proposed defense witness. Defendant's offer of proof did not establish that this testimony would have...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.