SIVIGNY v. SIVIGNY


236 A.D.2d 205 (1997)

653 N.Y.S.2d 328

Edward J. Sivigny, Jr., Appellant, v. Karen F. Sivigny, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 4, 1997


While a hearing is not necessarily required for the grant of sequestration under Domestic Relations Law § 243 (see, Adler v Adler, 203 A.D.2d 81), sequestration is a drastic remedy that should be granted only upon a showing of necessity, such as a consistent pattern of arrears or a willful violation of a court order directing payment of arrears (Manno v Manno, 224 A.D.2d 395...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases