1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 240 A.D.2d
  5. 240 A.D.2d 198 (1997)
 

WILLIAM CAPITAL ASSOCS., INC. v. HARRISON

240 A.D.2d 198 (1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 298

William Capital Associates, Inc., Respondent, v. Clifton S. Harrison et al., Defendants, and Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 10, 1997

BAII's present argument that the court erred in its apparent authority charge, or, in the alternative, that there was insufficient evidence of its subsidiary's executives' apparent authority to bind it to any agreement, is unpreserved either by exception to the charge or by a motion directed to the sufficiency of the evidence, and we decline to consider it (Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives v Kellerman,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases