CONGIUSTI v. INGERSOLL-RAND CO.


306 N.J. Super. 126 (1997)

DOMINICK CONGIUSTI AND NANCY CONGIUSTI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 11, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Altieri argued the cause for appellants.

Kenneth R. Meyer argued the cause for respondent (Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys; Mr. Meyer, of counsel and on the brief, and Kevin J. O'Connor, on the brief.)

Before Judges DREIER, KEEFE and PAUL G. LEVY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Dominick Congiusti and Nancy Congiusti, appeal from a judgment for defendant, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Inc., based upon a jury verdict in this product liability action. While employed by Mayrich Construction Company on April 28, 1990, Dominick Congiusti ("plaintiff," when used in the singular) was injured when an Ingersoll-Rand ECM-350 crawlair drilling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases