BRIZEL v. ESTIS


240 A.D.2d 190 (1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 280

Jeanne Brizel et al., Appellants, v. Warren A. Estis et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 5, 1997


Plaintiffs' claim that defendants violated a non-statutory regulation is not sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendants had a duty to install a handrail in the plaintiffs' apartment (see, Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 N.Y.2d 628; Velazquez v Tyler Graphics, 214 A.D.2d 489, 490). Furthermore, the lease between the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases