RASH v. ANDERSON

No. 97-1236.

80 Ohio St.3d 349 (1997)

RASH, APPELLANT, v. ANDERSON, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 3, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Rash, pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Donald Gary Keyser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Habeas Corpus Claim

In Rash's first proposition of law, he asserts that the court of appeals erred by denying his writ of habeas corpus. Rash claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation and resentence him, since his five-year probation period had expired.

When a court's judgment is void because the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, habeas corpus is generally an appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases