1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 78 Ohio
  5. 78 Ohio St.3d 351 (1997)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CICERO

No. 96-1432.

78 Ohio St.3d 351 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CICERO.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, Alvin E. Mathews and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel; and Samuel B. Weiner, for relator.

Andrew W. Cecil, Karl H. Schneider and Lewis W. Dye, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Relator objects to the board's report in two significant respects. Relator's first objection is that the board erred in finding that the relator did not file an amended complaint adding a DR 1-102(A)(4) violation to count one. Relator's next objection is that the board erred in failing to find a DR 9-101(C) violation under the facts presented at the hearings. Because of a lack of clear and convincing evidence to support either violation, we overrule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases