In response to defendant's uncontested assertions that none of the parties had actual notice of the dangerous cockleburs, which had dropped from trees to the sidewalk prior to plaintiff's fall, plaintiff asserts that the defendant had constructive knowledge of their dangerous accumulation for a sufficient length of time such that it had a duty to clear the walkway (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PRESSLEY v. NEW YORK CITY HOUS. AUTH.
238 A.D.2d 191 (1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 22
Helen Pressley, Respondent, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 10, 1997
April 10, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
