Defendant's submission of evidence of the underwriting practices it followed two years after it accepted plaintiff's application for insurance, coupled with conclusory deposition testimony of its underwriter, was insufficient to meet its burden of establishing that plaintiff's misrepresentations were material as a matter of law (see, Alaz Sportswear v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.