Per Curiam.
The commission denied claimant's motion for loss of use of both legs and right arm after finding that claimant's arm and leg problems were not part of the allowed conditions in the claim. Claimant successfully challenged that finding in the court below and, for the reasons to follow, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
The claim's additional allowance was denominated simply "aggravation of pre-existing multiple sclerosis,"...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
