GRINNELL v. CITY OF NEW YORK


244 A.D.2d 171 (1997)

663 N.Y.S.2d 844

James Grinnell et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. City of New York, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 6, 1997


The trial court properly declined to charge apportionment because there was insufficient evidence for the jury to determine which specific cause contributed to which separate injury (cf., Ravo v Rogatnick, 70 N.Y.2d 305, 312). Although it was error for the trial court to predetermine the award of medical expenses by filling in the amount on the interrogatory submitted to the jury, the error was unpreserved by objection, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases