YOUNG v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPS. CORP.


238 A.D.2d 174 (1997)

655 N.Y.S.2d 528

Kathryn Young, Appellant, v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 10, 1997


The dissent accurately portrays the facts; however, while it is well settled that treatment is deemed to be continuous for Statute of Limitations purposes "`when further treatment is explicitly anticipated by both physician and patient'" (De Peralta v Presbyterian Hosp., 121 A.D.2d 346, 349 [emphasis omitted]), it has also been stated that treatment is considered to be continuous until "a hospital or physician considers treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases