Per Curiam.
Martin denies that it violated Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-3-10(C)(1) and (2), or 4121:1-3-10(K)(5). The widow-claimants disagree, and assert further violations of Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-3-10(K)(6) and (8). They alternately dispute the necessity of award recalculation. For the reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in its entirety.
Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-3-10(C)(1) and (2) state:
"(1) The footing or anchorage for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.