MacKENZIE v. NEW JERSEY AUTO. FULL INS. UNDERWRITING ASS'N


299 N.J. Super. 112 (1997)

MICHAEL MacKENZIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND NEW JERSEY SHORE INSURANCE BROKERS, INC., THERESA COTUGNO AND STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Mirra argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Boglioli, O'Mara & Mirra, attorneys; Mr. Mirra, on the brief).

Richard B. Ansell argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Ansell, Zaro, Grimm & Aaron, attorneys; Mr. Ansell, of counsel; Stephanie H. Hodach, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, CONLEY and LOFTUS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONLEY, J.A.D.

This appeal arises from plaintiff insured's suit against his licensed broker, Theresa Cotugno/New Jersey Shore Insurance Brokers, Inc. (Shore),1 and against his insurer, the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association (JUA).2 Ultimately, plaintiff obtained a judgment against the JUA for reformation of his automobile policy and for $45...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases