ROSS & COHEN v. KURTZ STEEL CORP.


237 A.D.2d 172 (1997)

654 N.Y.S.2d 375

Ross & Cohen, Respondent, v. Kurtz Steel Corporation, Appellant. Thomas M. Curtis, Nonparty Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 18, 1997


The sanction was properly imposed against defendant's attorney for attempting to interject Judiciary Law § 487 claims against plaintiff law firm that were completely without merit in fact (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [1]). Defendant's affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction was properly dismissed for lack of proof. The first counterclaim alleging that plaintiff unlawfully retained a portion of the settlement proceeds of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases