The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was overwhelming evidence that defendant shared his codefendant's intent to sell heroin to the undercover officer, including evidence that defendant acknowledged that he was "working", accepted the undercover officer's order for drugs, and instructed the codefendant to fill the order.
The court properly admitted limited background testimony regarding methods...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.