Defendant's argument that the court's "two inference" charge diluted the People's burden of proof is without merit since the charge in question concerns the factual inferences to be drawn from the evidence in the case and makes no reference to the standard required for conviction that was separately charged. In any event, the inclusion of the "two inference" charge does not constitute reversible error because the court instructed the jury several times that to convict defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
