CINCINNATI SCH. DIST. BD. OF EDN. v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 96-934.

78 Ohio St.3d 325 (1997)

CINCINNATI SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wood & Lamping and David C. DiMuzio, for appellant.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Scheve, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Hamilton County Auditor.

Keating, Muething & Klekamp and Joseph L. Trauth, Jr., for appellee Gwynne Building Partners.


Per Curiam.

The auditor did not file a notice of appeal, but in his brief as appellee he argues for reversal of the BTA's decision. Sua sponte, the court strikes the auditor's brief.

The gist of the BOE's first contention is that the rebuttable presumption that sale price reflects true value arises in a valuation case only after proof that that sale was an arm's-length sale. We disagree with the BOE's contention.

In prior decisions we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases