The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's findings concerning the reliability of the identification testimony. With respect to the count charging grand larceny in the fourth degree pursuant to Penal Law § 155.30 (5), the evidence demonstrated that there was a "sufficient physical nexus" between the complainant's body and her pocketbook to establish that her pocketbook was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.